
Computational toxicology is a vibrant and rapidly developing discipline that integrates information and data from a variety of sources to develop mathematical and computer-based models to better understand and predict adverse health effects caused by chemicals, such as environmental pollutants and pharmaceuticals.
The global market for Computational Toxicology Service was estimated to be worth US$ million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of US$ million by 2030 with a CAGR of % during the forecast period 2024-2030.
North American market for Computational Toxicology Service was valued at $ million in 2023 and will reach $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.
Asia-Pacific market for Computational Toxicology Service was valued at $ million in 2023 and will reach $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.
Europe market for Computational Toxicology Service was valued at $ million in 2023 and will reach $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.
The global key companies of Computational Toxicology Service include Intertek, Instem, ToxStrategies, MultiCASE, Inotiv, ILS, ToxHub and Toxicology Solutions, etc. In 2023, the global five largest players hold a share approximately % in terms of revenue.
Report Scope
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Computational Toxicology Service, focusing on the total sales revenue, key companies market share and ranking, together with an analysis of Computational Toxicology Service by region & country, by Type, and by Application.
The Computational Toxicology Service market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of sales revenue ($ millions), considering 2023 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2019 to 2030. With both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Computational Toxicology Service.
Market Segmentation
By Company
Intertek
Instem
ToxStrategies
MultiCASE
Inotiv
ILS
ToxHub
Toxicology Solutions
Segment by Type:
Toxicity Prediction
Risk Assessment
Others
Segment by Application
Pharmaceutical
Food
Environment
Others
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
China Taiwan
Southeast Asia
India
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Argentina
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Chapter Outline
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, global total market size. This chapter also provides the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by manufacturers in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 2: Detailed analysis of Computational Toxicology Service manufacturers competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 3: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 5: Revenue of Computational Toxicology Service in regional level. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and market size of each country in the world.
Chapter 6: Revenue of Computational Toxicology Service in country level. It provides sigmate data by Type, and by Application for each country/region.
Chapter 7: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including product revenue, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 8: Analysis of industrial chain, including the upstream and downstream of the industry.
Chapter 9: Conclusion.
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Market Overview
1.1 Computational Toxicology Service Product Introduction
1.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Market Size Forecast
1.3 Computational Toxicology Service Market Trends & Drivers
1.3.1 Computational Toxicology Service Industry Trends
1.3.2 Computational Toxicology Service Market Drivers & Opportunity
1.3.3 Computational Toxicology Service Market Challenges
1.3.4 Computational Toxicology Service Market Restraints
1.4 Assumptions and Limitations
1.5 Study Objectives
1.6 Years Considered
2 Competitive Analysis by Company
2.1 Global Computational Toxicology Service Players Revenue Ranking (2023)
2.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Revenue by Company (2019-2024)
2.3 Key Companies Computational Toxicology Service Manufacturing Base Distribution and Headquarters
2.4 Key Companies Computational Toxicology Service Product Offered
2.5 Key Companies Time to Begin Mass Production of Computational Toxicology Service
2.6 Computational Toxicology Service Market Competitive Analysis
2.6.1 Computational Toxicology Service Market Concentration Rate (2019-2024)
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Companies by Computational Toxicology Service Revenue in 2023
2.6.3 Global Top Companies by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) & (based on the Revenue in Computational Toxicology Service as of 2023)
2.7 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion
3 Segmentation by Type
3.1 Introduction by Type
3.1.1 Toxicity Prediction
3.1.2 Risk Assessment
3.1.3 Others
3.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type
3.2.1 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (2019 VS 2023 VS 2030)
3.2.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, by Type (2019-2030)
3.2.3 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, by Type (%) (2019-2030)
4 Segmentation by Application
4.1 Introduction by Application
4.1.1 Pharmaceutical
4.1.2 Food
4.1.3 Environment
4.1.4 Others
4.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application
4.2.1 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application (2019 VS 2023 VS 2030)
4.2.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, by Application (2019-2030)
4.2.3 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, by Application (%) (2019-2030)
5 Segmentation by Region
5.1 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Region
5.1.1 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Region: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030
5.1.2 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Region (2019-2024)
5.1.3 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Region (2025-2030)
5.1.4 Global Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Region (%), (2019-2030)
5.2 North America
5.2.1 North America Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
5.2.2 North America Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Country (%), 2023 VS 2030
5.3 Europe
5.3.1 Europe Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
5.3.2 Europe Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Country (%), 2023 VS 2030
5.4 Asia Pacific
5.4.1 Asia Pacific Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
5.4.2 Asia Pacific Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Country (%), 2023 VS 2030
5.5 South America
5.5.1 South America Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
5.5.2 South America Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Country (%), 2023 VS 2030
5.6 Middle East & Africa
5.6.1 Middle East & Africa Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
5.6.2 Middle East & Africa Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Country (%), 2023 VS 2030
6 Segmentation by Key Countries/Regions
6.1 Key Countries/Regions Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value Growth Trends, 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030
6.2 Key Countries/Regions Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value
6.3 United States
6.3.1 United States Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.3.2 United States Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.3.3 United States Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.4 Europe
6.4.1 Europe Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.4.2 Europe Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.4.3 Europe Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.5 China
6.5.1 China Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.5.2 China Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.5.3 China Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.6 Japan
6.6.1 Japan Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.6.2 Japan Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.6.3 Japan Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.7 South Korea
6.7.1 South Korea Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.7.2 South Korea Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.7.3 South Korea Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.8 Southeast Asia
6.8.1 Southeast Asia Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.8.2 Southeast Asia Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.8.3 Southeast Asia Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
6.9 India
6.9.1 India Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value, 2019-2030
6.9.2 India Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Type (%), 2023 VS 2030
6.9.3 India Computational Toxicology Service Sales Value by Application, 2023 VS 2030
7 Company Profiles
7.1 Intertek
7.1.1 Intertek Profile
7.1.2 Intertek Main Business
7.1.3 Intertek Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.1.4 Intertek Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.1.5 Intertek Recent Developments
7.2 Instem
7.2.1 Instem Profile
7.2.2 Instem Main Business
7.2.3 Instem Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.2.4 Instem Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.2.5 Instem Recent Developments
7.3 ToxStrategies
7.3.1 ToxStrategies Profile
7.3.2 ToxStrategies Main Business
7.3.3 ToxStrategies Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.3.4 ToxStrategies Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.3.5 MultiCASE Recent Developments
7.4 MultiCASE
7.4.1 MultiCASE Profile
7.4.2 MultiCASE Main Business
7.4.3 MultiCASE Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.4.4 MultiCASE Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.4.5 MultiCASE Recent Developments
7.5 Inotiv
7.5.1 Inotiv Profile
7.5.2 Inotiv Main Business
7.5.3 Inotiv Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.5.4 Inotiv Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.5.5 Inotiv Recent Developments
7.6 ILS
7.6.1 ILS Profile
7.6.2 ILS Main Business
7.6.3 ILS Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.6.4 ILS Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.6.5 ILS Recent Developments
7.7 ToxHub
7.7.1 ToxHub Profile
7.7.2 ToxHub Main Business
7.7.3 ToxHub Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.7.4 ToxHub Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.7.5 ToxHub Recent Developments
7.8 Toxicology Solutions
7.8.1 Toxicology Solutions Profile
7.8.2 Toxicology Solutions Main Business
7.8.3 Toxicology Solutions Computational Toxicology Service Products, Services and Solutions
7.8.4 Toxicology Solutions Computational Toxicology Service Revenue (US$ Million) & (2019-2024)
7.8.5 Toxicology Solutions Recent Developments
8 Industry Chain Analysis
8.1 Computational Toxicology Service Industrial Chain
8.2 Computational Toxicology Service Upstream Analysis
8.2.1 Key Raw Materials
8.2.2 Raw Materials Key Suppliers
8.2.3 Manufacturing Cost Structure
8.3 Midstream Analysis
8.4 Downstream Analysis (Customers Analysis)
8.5 Sales Model and Sales Channels
8.5.1 Computational Toxicology Service Sales Model
8.5.2 Sales Channel
8.5.3 Computational Toxicology Service Distributors
9 Research Findings and Conclusion
10 Appendix
10.1 Research Methodology
10.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
10.1.2 Data Source
10.2 Author Details
10.3 Disclaimer
Intertek
Instem
ToxStrategies
MultiCASE
Inotiv
ILS
ToxHub
Toxicology Solutions
Ìý
Ìý
*If Applicable.
