Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Research Report 2025

Publication ID:

PB501251256

Publication Date:

January 22, 2025

Pages:

Publisher:

MRRPB5

Countries:

Global [1]

USD 2,900.00

IT Services [2]

Computing & Electronics [3]

Description:

The global market for Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service was valued at US$ 200 million in the year 2024 and is projected to reach a revised size of US$ 279 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 4.9% during the forecast period.
Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling based on (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SAR] and metabolic modeling have emerged as fundamental tools in the preliminary safety screening of novel molecules, such as plant extracts, fermentation products, or fungal secondary metabolites that are intended for use in food.
Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service is a professional service that provides the use of computer models and computational methods to predict the toxic effects of chemical substances. Combining chemistry, biology, computer science, and data analysis, this service aims to assess the toxic potential of chemicals to living organisms to support decision-making in areas such as drug discovery, chemical safety assessment, and environmental protection. Collect multiple data sources on chemical substance properties, molecular structure, biological activity, and toxicity test data. Features of chemical substances are extracted from the collected data, which may include molecular descriptors, physicochemical properties, metabolic pathways, etc. Using methods such as machine learning, statistics, and computational chemistry, build predictive models that correlate characteristics of chemical substances with their toxic effects. Validate the model, evaluate its predictive performance using an independent test dataset, and refine the model to improve accuracy. Use the optimized model to predict the toxicity of new chemical substances and explain the prediction results. Based on model predictions, assess the toxicity potential of chemicals and generate reports that provide decision makers with information on potential toxicity. Computational predictive toxicology modeling services can help speed up the toxicity assessment process, reduce the need for animal experiments, and reduce cost and time investment. It has broad application prospects in drug research and development, new chemical development, food additive safety assessment and other fields.
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service.
The Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of and revenue ($ millions), considering 2024 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2020 to 2031. This report segments the global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by Type, by Application, and by players, are also provided.
For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.
The report will help the Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service companies, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, by Type, by Application, and by regions.
Market Segmentation
By Company
Intertek Group
Harmonic Pharma
Instem (Leadscope)
Inotiv
Simulations Plus Inc
Lhasa Limited
MultiCASE
Schrodinger
Aclaris
Evogene
Deciphex (Patholytix)
Exscientia
Segment by Type
On-Premise
Cloud-Based
Segment by Application
Academia
Enterprise
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
Chapter Outline
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by Type, by Application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Introduces executive summary of global market size, regional market size, this section also introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by companies in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service company competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa segment by country. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and capacity of each country in the world.
Chapter 11: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including product sales, revenue, price, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 12: The main points and conclusions of the report.

Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.

Table Of Contents:

1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
1.2.2 On-Premise
1.2.3 Cloud-Based
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth by Application: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
1.3.2 Academia
1.3.3 Enterprise
1.4 Assumptions and Limitations
1.5 Study Objectives
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Perspective (2020-2031)
2.2 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Region: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
2.2.2 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Historic Market Size by Region (2020-2025)
2.2.3 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Forecasted Market Size by Region (2026-2031)
2.3 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Dynamics
2.3.1 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Industry Trends
2.3.2 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Drivers
2.3.3 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Challenges
2.3.4 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Players by Revenue (2020-2025)
3.1.2 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Revenue Market Share by Players (2020-2025)
3.2 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Global Key Players Ranking by Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Revenue
3.4 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Revenue in 2024
3.5 Global Key Players of Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Head office and Area Served
3.6 Global Key Players of Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service, Product and Application
3.7 Global Key Players of Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service, Date of Enter into This Industry
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Historic Market Size by Type (2020-2025)
4.2 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Forecasted Market Size by Type (2026-2031)
5 Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Historic Market Size by Application (2020-2025)
5.2 Global Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Forecasted Market Size by Application (2026-2031)
6 North America
6.1 North America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size (2020-2031)
6.2 North America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth Rate by Country: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
6.3 North America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2020-2025)
6.4 North America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2026-2031)
6.5 United States
6.6 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size (2020-2031)
7.2 Europe Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth Rate by Country: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
7.3 Europe Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2020-2025)
7.4 Europe Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2026-2031)
7.5 Germany
7.6 France
7.7 U.K.
7.8 Italy
7.9 Russia
7.10 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size (2020-2031)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth Rate by Region: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
8.3 Asia-Pacific Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Region (2020-2025)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Region (2026-2031)
8.5 China
8.6 Japan
8.7 South Korea
8.8 Southeast Asia
8.9 India
8.10 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size (2020-2031)
9.2 Latin America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth Rate by Country: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
9.3 Latin America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2020-2025)
9.4 Latin America Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2026-2031)
9.5 Mexico
9.6 Brazil
10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size (2020-2031)
10.2 Middle East & Africa Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Growth Rate by Country: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
10.3 Middle East & Africa Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2020-2025)
10.4 Middle East & Africa Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Market Size by Country (2026-2031)
10.5 Turkey
10.6 Saudi Arabia
10.7 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Intertek Group
11.1.1 Intertek Group Company Details
11.1.2 Intertek Group Business Overview
11.1.3 Intertek Group Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.1.4 Intertek Group Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.1.5 Intertek Group Recent Development
11.2 Harmonic Pharma
11.2.1 Harmonic Pharma Company Details
11.2.2 Harmonic Pharma Business Overview
11.2.3 Harmonic Pharma Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.2.4 Harmonic Pharma Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.2.5 Harmonic Pharma Recent Development
11.3 Instem (Leadscope)
11.3.1 Instem (Leadscope) Company Details
11.3.2 Instem (Leadscope) Business Overview
11.3.3 Instem (Leadscope) Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.3.4 Instem (Leadscope) Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.3.5 Instem (Leadscope) Recent Development
11.4 Inotiv
11.4.1 Inotiv Company Details
11.4.2 Inotiv Business Overview
11.4.3 Inotiv Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.4.4 Inotiv Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.4.5 Inotiv Recent Development
11.5 Simulations Plus Inc
11.5.1 Simulations Plus Inc Company Details
11.5.2 Simulations Plus Inc Business Overview
11.5.3 Simulations Plus Inc Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.5.4 Simulations Plus Inc Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.5.5 Simulations Plus Inc Recent Development
11.6 Lhasa Limited
11.6.1 Lhasa Limited Company Details
11.6.2 Lhasa Limited Business Overview
11.6.3 Lhasa Limited Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.6.4 Lhasa Limited Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.6.5 Lhasa Limited Recent Development
11.7 MultiCASE
11.7.1 MultiCASE Company Details
11.7.2 MultiCASE Business Overview
11.7.3 MultiCASE Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.7.4 MultiCASE Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.7.5 MultiCASE Recent Development
11.8 Schrodinger
11.8.1 Schrodinger Company Details
11.8.2 Schrodinger Business Overview
11.8.3 Schrodinger Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.8.4 Schrodinger Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.8.5 Schrodinger Recent Development
11.9 Aclaris
11.9.1 Aclaris Company Details
11.9.2 Aclaris Business Overview
11.9.3 Aclaris Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.9.4 Aclaris Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.9.5 Aclaris Recent Development
11.10 Evogene
11.10.1 Evogene Company Details
11.10.2 Evogene Business Overview
11.10.3 Evogene Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.10.4 Evogene Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.10.5 Evogene Recent Development
11.11 Deciphex (Patholytix)
11.11.1 Deciphex (Patholytix) Company Details
11.11.2 Deciphex (Patholytix) Business Overview
11.11.3 Deciphex (Patholytix) Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.11.4 Deciphex (Patholytix) Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.11.5 Deciphex (Patholytix) Recent Development
11.12 Exscientia
11.12.1 Exscientia Company Details
11.12.2 Exscientia Business Overview
11.12.3 Exscientia Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Introduction
11.12.4 Exscientia Revenue in Computational Predictive Toxicology Modeling Service Business (2020-2025)
11.12.5 Exscientia Recent Development
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.1.1 Research Programs/Design
13.1.1.2 Market Size Estimation
13.1.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
13.1.2 Data Source
13.1.2.1 Secondary Sources
13.1.2.2 Primary Sources
13.2 Author Details
13.3 Disclaimer

Companies Mentioned:

Intertek Group
Harmonic Pharma
Instem (Leadscope)
Inotiv
Simulations Plus Inc
Lhasa Limited
MultiCASE
Schrodinger
Aclaris
Evogene
Deciphex (Patholytix)
Exscientia

License Types:

Single User License (PDF)

This license allows for use of a publication by one person.
This person may print out a single copy of the publication.
This person can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.
This person cannot share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons.
Unless a Enterprise License is purchased, a Single User License must be purchased for every person that wishes to use the publication within the same organization.
Customers who infringe these license terms are liable for a Global license fee.

听

Site License (PDF)*

This license allows for use of a publication by all users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office.
These users may print out a single copy of the publication.
These users can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.
These users cannot share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons outside the corporate location for which the publication is purchased.
Unless a Enterprise License is purchased, a Site User License must be purchased for every corporate location by an organization that wishes to use the publication within the same organization.
Customers who infringe these license terms are liable for a Global license fee.

听

Global License (PDF)*

This license allows for use of a publication by unlimited users within the purchasing organization e.g. all employees of a single company.
Each of these people may use the publication on any computer, and may print out the report, but may not share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons outside of the organization.
These employees of purchasing organization can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.

*If Applicable.

91制片厂