
Highlights
The global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation market was valued at US$ million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach US$ million by 2029, witnessing a CAGR of % during the forecast period 2023-2029. The influence of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine War were considered while estimating market sizes.
North American market for Internet Breach and Attack Simulation is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
Asia-Pacific market for Internet Breach and Attack Simulation is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The global market for Internet Breach and Attack Simulation in Enterprise is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The key global companies of Internet Breach and Attack Simulation include Qualys (US), Rapid7 (US), DXC Technology (US), AttackIQ (US), Cymulate (Israel), XM Cyber (Israel), Skybox Security (US), SafeBreach (US) and Firemon (US), etc. In 2022, the world's top three vendors accounted for approximately % of the revenue.
Report Scope
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Internet Breach and Attack Simulation, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Internet Breach and Attack Simulation.
The Internet Breach and Attack Simulation market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of and revenue ($ millions), considering 2022 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2018 to 2029. This report segments the global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by type, by application, and by players, are also provided.
For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.
The report will help the Internet Breach and Attack Simulation companies, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, by type, by application, and by regions.
By Company
Qualys (US)
Rapid7 (US)
DXC Technology (US)
AttackIQ (US)
Cymulate (Israel)
XM Cyber (Israel)
Skybox Security (US)
SafeBreach (US)
Firemon (US)
Verdoin (FireEye) (US)
NopSec (US)
Threatcare (US)
Mazebolt (US)
Scythe (US)
Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel)
Pcysys (Israel)
Segment by Type
Platforms/Tools
Services
Segment by Application
Enterprise
Data Centers
Service Providers
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
Core Chapters
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by type, application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Introduces executive summary of global market size, regional market size, this section also introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by companies in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Internet Breach and Attack Simulation companies’ competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa segment by country. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and capacity of each country in the world.
Chapter 11: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the key companies in the market in detail, including product revenue, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 12: The main points and conclusions of the report.
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Market Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 Platforms/Tools
1.2.3 Services
1.3 Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth by Application: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 Enterprise
1.3.3 Data Centers
1.3.4 Service Providers
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Perspective (2018-2029)
2.2 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
2.2.2 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Historic Market Size by Region (2018-2023)
2.2.3 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Forecasted Market Size by Region (2024-2029)
2.3 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Dynamics
2.3.1 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Industry Trends
2.3.2 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Drivers
2.3.3 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Challenges
2.3.4 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Players by Revenue (2018-2023)
3.1.2 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Revenue Market Share by Players (2018-2023)
3.2 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Revenue
3.4 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Revenue in 2022
3.5 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Historic Market Size by Type (2018-2023)
4.2 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Forecasted Market Size by Type (2024-2029)
5 Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Historic Market Size by Application (2018-2023)
5.2 Global Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Forecasted Market Size by Application (2024-2029)
6 North America
6.1 North America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size (2018-2029)
6.2 North America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
6.3 North America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2018-2023)
6.4 North America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2024-2029)
6.5 United States
6.6 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size (2018-2029)
7.2 Europe Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
7.3 Europe Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2018-2023)
7.4 Europe Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2024-2029)
7.5 Germany
7.6 France
7.7 U.K.
7.8 Italy
7.9 Russia
7.10 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size (2018-2029)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth Rate by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
8.3 Asia-Pacific Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Region (2018-2023)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Region (2024-2029)
8.5 China
8.6 Japan
8.7 South Korea
8.8 Southeast Asia
8.9 India
8.10 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size (2018-2029)
9.2 Latin America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
9.3 Latin America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2018-2023)
9.4 Latin America Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2024-2029)
9.5 Mexico
9.6 Brazil
10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size (2018-2029)
10.2 Middle East & Africa Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
10.3 Middle East & Africa Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2018-2023)
10.4 Middle East & Africa Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Market Size by Country (2024-2029)
10.5 Turkey
10.6 Saudi Arabia
10.7 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Qualys (US)
11.1.1 Qualys (US) Company Detail
11.1.2 Qualys (US) Business Overview
11.1.3 Qualys (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.1.4 Qualys (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.1.5 Qualys (US) Recent Development
11.2 Rapid7 (US)
11.2.1 Rapid7 (US) Company Detail
11.2.2 Rapid7 (US) Business Overview
11.2.3 Rapid7 (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.2.4 Rapid7 (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.2.5 Rapid7 (US) Recent Development
11.3 DXC Technology (US)
11.3.1 DXC Technology (US) Company Detail
11.3.2 DXC Technology (US) Business Overview
11.3.3 DXC Technology (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.3.4 DXC Technology (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.3.5 DXC Technology (US) Recent Development
11.4 AttackIQ (US)
11.4.1 AttackIQ (US) Company Detail
11.4.2 AttackIQ (US) Business Overview
11.4.3 AttackIQ (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.4.4 AttackIQ (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.4.5 AttackIQ (US) Recent Development
11.5 Cymulate (Israel)
11.5.1 Cymulate (Israel) Company Detail
11.5.2 Cymulate (Israel) Business Overview
11.5.3 Cymulate (Israel) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.5.4 Cymulate (Israel) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.5.5 Cymulate (Israel) Recent Development
11.6 XM Cyber (Israel)
11.6.1 XM Cyber (Israel) Company Detail
11.6.2 XM Cyber (Israel) Business Overview
11.6.3 XM Cyber (Israel) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.6.4 XM Cyber (Israel) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.6.5 XM Cyber (Israel) Recent Development
11.7 Skybox Security (US)
11.7.1 Skybox Security (US) Company Detail
11.7.2 Skybox Security (US) Business Overview
11.7.3 Skybox Security (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.7.4 Skybox Security (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.7.5 Skybox Security (US) Recent Development
11.8 SafeBreach (US)
11.8.1 SafeBreach (US) Company Detail
11.8.2 SafeBreach (US) Business Overview
11.8.3 SafeBreach (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.8.4 SafeBreach (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.8.5 SafeBreach (US) Recent Development
11.9 Firemon (US)
11.9.1 Firemon (US) Company Detail
11.9.2 Firemon (US) Business Overview
11.9.3 Firemon (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.9.4 Firemon (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.9.5 Firemon (US) Recent Development
11.10 Verdoin (FireEye) (US)
11.10.1 Verdoin (FireEye) (US) Company Detail
11.10.2 Verdoin (FireEye) (US) Business Overview
11.10.3 Verdoin (FireEye) (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.10.4 Verdoin (FireEye) (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.10.5 Verdoin (FireEye) (US) Recent Development
11.11 NopSec (US)
11.11.1 NopSec (US) Company Detail
11.11.2 NopSec (US) Business Overview
11.11.3 NopSec (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.11.4 NopSec (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.11.5 NopSec (US) Recent Development
11.12 Threatcare (US)
11.12.1 Threatcare (US) Company Detail
11.12.2 Threatcare (US) Business Overview
11.12.3 Threatcare (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.12.4 Threatcare (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.12.5 Threatcare (US) Recent Development
11.13 Mazebolt (US)
11.13.1 Mazebolt (US) Company Detail
11.13.2 Mazebolt (US) Business Overview
11.13.3 Mazebolt (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.13.4 Mazebolt (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.13.5 Mazebolt (US) Recent Development
11.14 Scythe (US)
11.14.1 Scythe (US) Company Detail
11.14.2 Scythe (US) Business Overview
11.14.3 Scythe (US) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.14.4 Scythe (US) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.14.5 Scythe (US) Recent Development
11.15 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel)
11.15.1 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Company Detail
11.15.2 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Business Overview
11.15.3 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.15.4 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.15.5 Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Recent Development
11.16 Pcysys (Israel)
11.16.1 Pcysys (Israel) Company Detail
11.16.2 Pcysys (Israel) Business Overview
11.16.3 Pcysys (Israel) Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Introduction
11.16.4 Pcysys (Israel) Revenue in Internet Breach and Attack Simulation Business (2018-2023)
11.16.5 Pcysys (Israel) Recent Development
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Disclaimer
13.3 Author Details
Qualys (US)
Rapid7 (US)
DXC Technology (US)
AttackIQ (US)
Cymulate (Israel)
XM Cyber (Israel)
Skybox Security (US)
SafeBreach (US)
Firemon (US)
Verdoin (FireEye) (US)
NopSec (US)
Threatcare (US)
Mazebolt (US)
Scythe (US)
Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel)
Pcysys (Israel)
Ìý
Ìý
*If Applicable.
